Re: 310 (Michael) (failed)

by **michaelenstone** Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:34 pm

Voting results:
Me: for
Metcalfe: against
Cooper: against
Jones: for
Holton: for
Probyn: abstain (for)

Vote fails

by **michaelenstone** Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:55 pm

Game is getting complicated...took 20 mins to update score etc.

Anyway, it's Neil's Turn, voting commences at 1:34 on Sunday

by **Neil** Sat Jul 13, 2013 1:43 am

Perhaps you should have taken a bit longer. Please review the post I've followed up with. I mean to take this opportunity to set a new precedent:

Keep latest scores in latest score post.

Apply maths of roles in sequence demonstrated.

Include previous and new scores in tables, to allow easy comparison / validation. Clearly I think the way you did it is not right. I may be wrong, but if I am, at least you can pick out where the corrections need to be.

by **michaelenstone** Sat Jul 13, 2013 1:49 am

My understanding was that the roles were only executed on someone's proposal i.e. scored once per round and not each turn as per your scoring. You're rule doesn't state explicitly either way...

by **Neil** Sat Jul 13, 2013 2:01 am

That's not my intent. It's also not how Dom's and Robin's proposals were scored (albeit incorrectly). I agree it's not clear. We did discuss it in the end of that thread.

by Sponsored content